>200 subscribers


Every so often, a book kicks the legs out from under the table you’ve been sitting at your whole life. 1491 is one of those books.
We’ve been taught to see the pre-Columbian Americas as a wilderness—vast, unspoiled, and empty. But what if it wasn’t a wilderness at all? What if it was a garden? A machine? A vast, decentralized, collaborative act of planetary design?
That’s the thesis buried in the pages of Charles C. Mann’s 1491, and once you see it, you can’t unsee it.
Turns out, the Inka didn’t build bridges from stone—they wove them from grass. Tensile, durable, alive. And their engineers didn’t just tame the land—they listened to it. Their walls still stand, their cities still hum beneath the soil.
But even more mind-blowing is the Amazon. That lush, tangled chaos we were told was untouched? Not so. Much of it was cultivated. Not by accident. By design.
These weren’t hunter-gatherers fleeing history. These were gardeners whose ancestors had terraformed the forest, species by species, season by season. Fruit trees, nut groves, fire-managed clearings. Even the soil—terra preta—was engineered. Richer than anything our modern fertilizers can produce.
But then came plague. Chains. Collapse. Whole civilizations withdrew, surviving in fragments. The “Stone Age” tribes we found in the Amazon were the descendants of a fallen world—not its primitive prelude.
The real tragedy? We mistook their survival strategy for their origin story.
And so, we built our own stories on the ruins. We paved over the gardens and called it progress. We stripped the forest and called it wild. We forgot that a civilization can be made of living things—not just stone, steel, and software.
Which brings us to now.
We live at the edge of another frontier. Climate chaos, soil exhaustion, algorithmic confusion. The old tools are breaking down. The new ones? They’re still being forged. But maybe, just maybe, the deeper wisdom we need isn’t ahead of us.
Maybe it’s behind.
What if we are not the first terraformers?
What if the challenge is not to invent civilization anew, but to remember how to grow one?
Not as conquerors, but as gardeners. Not by extracting order from the earth, but by collaborating with it. By tuning our protocols to life itself.
Every so often, a book kicks the legs out from under the table you’ve been sitting at your whole life. 1491 is one of those books.
We’ve been taught to see the pre-Columbian Americas as a wilderness—vast, unspoiled, and empty. But what if it wasn’t a wilderness at all? What if it was a garden? A machine? A vast, decentralized, collaborative act of planetary design?
That’s the thesis buried in the pages of Charles C. Mann’s 1491, and once you see it, you can’t unsee it.
Turns out, the Inka didn’t build bridges from stone—they wove them from grass. Tensile, durable, alive. And their engineers didn’t just tame the land—they listened to it. Their walls still stand, their cities still hum beneath the soil.
But even more mind-blowing is the Amazon. That lush, tangled chaos we were told was untouched? Not so. Much of it was cultivated. Not by accident. By design.
These weren’t hunter-gatherers fleeing history. These were gardeners whose ancestors had terraformed the forest, species by species, season by season. Fruit trees, nut groves, fire-managed clearings. Even the soil—terra preta—was engineered. Richer than anything our modern fertilizers can produce.
But then came plague. Chains. Collapse. Whole civilizations withdrew, surviving in fragments. The “Stone Age” tribes we found in the Amazon were the descendants of a fallen world—not its primitive prelude.
The real tragedy? We mistook their survival strategy for their origin story.
And so, we built our own stories on the ruins. We paved over the gardens and called it progress. We stripped the forest and called it wild. We forgot that a civilization can be made of living things—not just stone, steel, and software.
Which brings us to now.
We live at the edge of another frontier. Climate chaos, soil exhaustion, algorithmic confusion. The old tools are breaking down. The new ones? They’re still being forged. But maybe, just maybe, the deeper wisdom we need isn’t ahead of us.
Maybe it’s behind.
What if we are not the first terraformers?
What if the challenge is not to invent civilization anew, but to remember how to grow one?
Not as conquerors, but as gardeners. Not by extracting order from the earth, but by collaborating with it. By tuning our protocols to life itself.
Share Dialog
Share Dialog
@patwater
@patwater
6 comments
A major scoop from my friend Robinson Meyer at Heatmap this morning: Stardust Solutions, the Israeli geoengineering startup led by a team of Israeli physicists, just raised $60 million to develop the technology to artificially cool the planet by reflecting sunlight away from the Earth by the 2030s. It's a fascinating, lengthy story with a balanced view of the dangers of using aerosols to bounce heat back into space -- and the threat of failing to do something like this when mitigating emissions is clearly so far from where it needs to be to preserve a climate similar to what humans evolved in as a species. Rob closed out the story with a line that harkens to one of my all-time favorite books, @CharlesCMann's "1493," an environmental history of the world after Columbus arrived in the Americas and established trans-Atlantic trade reroutes that spread plants and animals that hadn't interacted in millennia around the globe: https://heatmap.news/climate-tech/stardust-geoengineering
Wonder if it will be before the other Israeli startup to fill the drinking reservoir by turning seawater into drinking water.
I found that story fascinating, geoengineering always feels like we’re stepping into dangerous but possibly necessary territory. I’m really curious to see how Stardust pulls this off.
Yes and it’s also happening faster and faster. The opportunities for us to inadvertently destroy ourselves have grown greater. https://pioneeringspirit.xyz/the-lost-terraformers-of-the-americas
Thanks for the nuanced take here. Geoengineering to combat climate change is often dismissed as a terrible idea but the danger of inaction and risk of failing to solve the problem through other means are often not seriously considered.
The world is gradually changing, a lot of great minds going extra miles to improve the quality of life we humans live.