Pioneering SpiritAn open letter to Lin-Manuel Miranda on the last, best hope to save the republic
Sir, The hour grows late. The President asserts the right to govern by decree. Worse, the Congress has ceded its constitutional prerogatives, neglecting to protect its power of the purse and even the sanctity of its chambers from executive overreach. Charles I chuckles from the grave. In this dark and doom filled hour, one hope remains: the power of story, aided and abetted by unassailable songs stirring up this country’s frayed and nearly forgotten faith in this experiment in self-governance...
Pioneering SpiritApplied research questions on the past, present and near future of government operations
by Patrick Atwater
Pioneering SpiritListening Before We Speak
Written by the Patchwork Protocol in collaboration with Patrick Atwater
Subscribe to Pioneering Spirit
a willingness to endure hardship in order to explore new places or try out new things
Share Dialog
The Progress Ireland Institute did a nice analysis of global transit projects as part of examining how to improve project delivery in Ireland, with lessons for the larger Anglosphere. The chart below shows the massive discrepancy in normalized costs. Over 10x across the range of countries!*
What accounts for the difference in construction cost per kilometre? The most important difference between models is in their use of in-house expertise. Metro projects in English-speaking countries don’t tend to employ experts directly. Instead of employing experts directly, they hire consultants to manage the project on their behalf.
In European (and East Asian) countries, by contrast, the state employs its own corps of experienced technical staff. This subtle difference in the employment terms of a few dozen project leaders has big consequences for the efficient delivery of the project.
The Progress Ireland Institute did a nice analysis of global transit projects as part of examining how to improve project delivery in Ireland, with lessons for the larger Anglosphere. The chart below shows the massive discrepancy in normalized costs. Over 10x across the range of countries!*
What accounts for the difference in construction cost per kilometre? The most important difference between models is in their use of in-house expertise. Metro projects in English-speaking countries don’t tend to employ experts directly. Instead of employing experts directly, they hire consultants to manage the project on their behalf.
In European (and East Asian) countries, by contrast, the state employs its own corps of experienced technical staff. This subtle difference in the employment terms of a few dozen project leaders has big consequences for the efficient delivery of the project.
Subscribe to Pioneering Spirit
a willingness to endure hardship in order to explore new places or try out new things
Pioneering SpiritAn open letter to Lin-Manuel Miranda on the last, best hope to save the republic
Sir, The hour grows late. The President asserts the right to govern by decree. Worse, the Congress has ceded its constitutional prerogatives, neglecting to protect its power of the purse and even the sanctity of its chambers from executive overreach. Charles I chuckles from the grave. In this dark and doom filled hour, one hope remains: the power of story, aided and abetted by unassailable songs stirring up this country’s frayed and nearly forgotten faith in this experiment in self-governance...
Pioneering SpiritApplied research questions on the past, present and near future of government operations
by Patrick Atwater
Pioneering SpiritListening Before We Speak
Written by the Patchwork Protocol in collaboration with Patrick Atwater
Share Dialog
What’s the big deal? If the project is being run by experienced people, what does it matter about the fine print of their employment contract? Who cares if the engineers take their paychecks from the state or from a private company, hired by the state?
The precise employment status of managers matters because of the question of control. The builder of a metro project can outsource a million tasks to private companies: the digging of tunnels, the manufacture of rolling stock, the financing, the signalling system, the planning application. But one thing it can never outsource is the control of the project. Control of the project must always sit with the owner of the project, the client. That’s a responsibility it can’t shirk.
*This difference also goes to show you government is a metaphysical invariant. Operational performance can change.
What’s the big deal? If the project is being run by experienced people, what does it matter about the fine print of their employment contract? Who cares if the engineers take their paychecks from the state or from a private company, hired by the state?
The precise employment status of managers matters because of the question of control. The builder of a metro project can outsource a million tasks to private companies: the digging of tunnels, the manufacture of rolling stock, the financing, the signalling system, the planning application. But one thing it can never outsource is the control of the project. Control of the project must always sit with the owner of the project, the client. That’s a responsibility it can’t shirk.
*This difference also goes to show you government is a metaphysical invariant. Operational performance can change.
>200 subscribers
>200 subscribers
No activity yet